Skip to main content

Google Plays Around

Google has re-branded the Android Market to the Google Play Store. While I understand this to be a part of a larger strategy to bring all of Google's offerings under one banner, I must say I'm not impressed with how this has been handled by Google. Google seems to be searching for a way to compete with the ecosystems that Apple, Amazon and Microsoft are building and by changing the branding for their digital marketplaces overnight, I will argue has caused even more confusion.

From the get go, the Google Play announcement was a strange one. Announced with nothing more than a blog post and then pushed to users with no warning or plan, it caused nothing but confusion for those who have Android devices and don't keep up with Google's latest plans. Thankfully Verizon had the foresight to send a text to Android device owners to warn them of the impending change, but that was one carrier in one country. Most consumers don't visit Google's web version of the Android Market so they wouldn't see the announcement of the change there. Instead, consumers we met with being asked to accept new terms of service when they launched the Market the next time which would then replace the Market with the Play Store on their devices. On my Epic Touch 4G this transition was not smooth. After accepting the terms, I exited the store only to want to re-enter it by tapping the Market shortcut I had placed on my home screen. I was greeted with a "This application is no longer installed on your device" error message.

I know I was not the only one to face this problem. Other's who removed the shortcut from their home screens,  upon entering their app drawer to re-add the Market shortcut, found they couldn't find the Market app anymore and wrongly assumed that they had somehow deleted the Market from their devices. My own fiancee faced this very situation, and only after explaining the change and what icon she needed, was she able to get back to the Play Store. This has not been an isolated incident either.

I understand Google's approach. They feel they need to re-brand and bring all of their digital offerings under one banner to better market their storefronts to consumers, who for the most part seem to be shying away from purchasing premium content in Google's markets. The problems is Google doesn't have a robust tablet and desktop experience like Apple and Microsoft. If you want to enjoy the music purchased through Google, you must use a web browser, same with books, movies, and apps, all in the web browser. Apple has iTunes on Mac or PC, iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV, Microsoft has the Zune client, Xbox 360, Windows Phone and soon Windows 8. Google has Chrome and Chrome OS to back up Android handsets. Yes there is Google TV and Android Tablets, but neither has seen commercial success comparable to Android on phones.

There in lies the problem. Everyone understands why having Google services on their phone is a viable option, what they don't understand is why their PC or TV or tablet should. Especially when Apple and Microsoft make much better competing products. Consumers still like having a physical copy of their media on their physical devices that stay at home. That's why iTunes is still the dominant place to get music, that's why people buy movies on DVDs or Blu-Ray still, to own a copy. Even iTunes let you purchase and keep movies, Google only lets you rent and stream. We may be moving to a cloud storage world, where physical files never make it down to our desktop, but we aren't there yet. Always on, always available internet isn't there yet and because of that Google is missing out on the whole ecosystem. Consumers still want to be able to see their files on their computer, to know they have control of them and that in case Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Google or whoever they are hosting with screws up, their content is still safe.

Google is clearly a forward looking company, but the world hasn't caught up with their vision yet. With the way things are going, I don't think the world will be ready for a cloud only option within the next 10 years. Data speeds are still too slow, 4G LTE still has a small worldwide footprint and data plans are still too restrictive to be pushing around the content that Google wants to from their cloud to your device. For the foreseeable future, local storage still wins and Google needs to realize that if they want to keep their mobile advantage they've built with Android.

Popular posts from this blog

ARMing Windows

Qualcomm announced on June 4th, the Snapdragon 850 for use exclusively in PCs. A move that is clearly designed to improve the shortcomings of the Snapdragon 835 in current ARM-based Windows PCs. In fact, Qualcomm is telling us to expect a 30% improvement in performance over the 835 chip.
This new class of ARM chip from Qualcomm signals a new shot in the ongoing war of Intel vs ARM. Qualcomm clearly sees the opportunity for a return on its investment in customizing silicon for PCs otherwise the new wave of Always On, Always Connected PCs would be using the Snapdragon 845 that is currently featured in high-end smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S9 or OnePlus 6. The 850 is the second-generation of the 10nm platform that debuted with the 835. Intel is now only beginning to slowly roll out 10nm chips, showing they've had a hard time reliably stepping down from 14nm.
I believe this new chip, along with continued development of Windows 10 on ARM could potentially make this new category of…

Windows 8 Review

Before I begin my review on Windows 8, I want to explain how I approached this review. I'm not going to review Windows 8 from the power user's perspective, I'm looking at this from the average, casual computer user. That is the user who is going to be most affected by this change from Windows 7 to Windows 8. To that end, I've been using Windows 8 for the past two months in the most traditional way, on my work PC and on my home PC, with no new touch or gesture enabled hardware, just a keyboard and a mouse.

Windows 8: A Bipolar Operating System Windows 8 represents a monumental shift from Microsoft to combat Apple and Android devices that have been stealing mind and market-share away from Windows based devices. Unlike Google who has Chrome OS and Android or Apple who has OSX and iOS, Microsoft is opting to use Windows 8 across the board for phone, tablet and desktop. While this strategy allows for Microsoft to re-use thousands of lines of code across platforms, it also f…

Life, Death and Tech

On April 6th 2013, I lost my sister, Anne Smedinghoff, to a suicide bomber in Afghanistan, where she was stationed working as Foreign Service Press Officer for the State Department. She was on a mission to deliver books to a school. Books being so important to help increase the literacy rate in Afghanistan so young people are able to read the Quran and other books for themselves to make informed decisions. The days and months that have followed have been the hardest days on my short life so far, and the struggle to move forward is not over for me. Through it all, I have come to several realizations about the industry I love to cover I want to share with people, especially through the lens of losing a loved one.

The thing that struck me first, is that my sister carried her iPhone 4S in her 'go-to bag' that she was holding at
the time of the attack. The iPhone is one of the most dropped, damaged, broken devices I see in people's hands, screens are cracked and backs are shatt…