Skip to main content

Samsung Shows us the First Windows Phone 8

Samsung is out the door with the world's first Windows 8 Phone. The Ativ S. Basically a Samsung Galaxy S III running Windows Phone. I don't mean that as a put down to the device. One of the reasons (in my mind) why Windows Phone hasn't succeeded when compared to the iPhone or Android is because of hardware buzzwords that Windows Phone couldn't stack up next to it's name. Does the average consumer know how the dual or quad core processor in their phone is or isn't helping them? Of course not. But they'll tell you it's there and claim to feel the speed difference over their old phone that likely has nothing to do with the processor. We all saw how many AT&T iPhone 4S customers thought their iPhones were going so much faster after the "4G" label got added to their phones with the iOS 5.1 update when they were still using the same 3G network as before. This perception is real enough that consumers will spend money on what they believe to be true, so having the same specifications as their iPhone and Android brethren is a win for Windows Phone.

The Samsung Ativ S
Even though Samsung spent a whole two minutes showing off the phone in their presentation after spending 30 minutes plus on the Galaxy Note 2, the fact that Samsung went with what is obviously a superior phone build quality for the Ativ S over the Galaxy S3 says to me that Microsoft's OEMs, while cautious about the future of Windows Phone, see it at a premium brand. Together with Windows 8 on tablets and desktops, Microsoft is putting together it's most cohesive environment for consumers it's ever offered. Samsung wants to make sure they are a part of it, and they want to look good doing it.

With the exception of the Nokia Lumia line of Windows Phones, both HTC and Samsung have used somewhat tired, uninspiring and recycled designs in their phones for Windows Phone 7 and 7.5. This lackluster support for Microsoft's platform has been reflected in sales and in the brand perception of Windows Phone. Microsoft changed all that when they unveiled the Surface line of tablets. Microsoft showed the world that once again, Windows is a premium brand and that it deserved premium products to show it off.

The winds of change are coming to the mobile computing world. Android has awakened the sleeping giant in Microsoft. In my opinion, Android has the most to lose from a Microsoft resurgence. Many Android users bought in because they couldn't get an iPhone or didn't like Apple's system, now that Microsoft has begun to play it's hand, Android is going to be the odd man out, without a home operating system to tie into and pull users from. If the other OEMs give their Windows Phones the same white glove treatment as Samsung has for the Ativ S, Android is going to lose consumers to the premium feel and the overall ecosystem of Windows' rebirth from Microsoft.

Update: Clarified my statement about the iPhone 4S and it's "4G" network indicator for AT&T

Popular posts from this blog

Windows 10 S and Microsoft's Future

A few weeks ago, Microsoft held a press event to announce their new Education initiatives. While many focused on the high end hardware that was announced in the Surface Laptop, I am much more interested in the new version of Windows 10 that was announced: Windows 10 S.

Some have called Windows 10 S, "the future of Windows." I tend to agree. But I never think it will be the only version of Windows. Right now, at best, Windows 10 S will be the version of Windows your grandma, your parents, or your kids can use. But the "power users," the core of those who make up the creatives that Microsoft seems to be trying to cater to lately, will find the OS limitations a non-starter.

For those who still aren't aware, Windows 10 S, at it's core is a version of Windows that can only run applications delivered through the Windows 10 Store. The idea behind this is sound. It's the basic principal behind the iPad, iPhone, and Chrome OS (to a lesser extent). With a locked do…

iPhone X isn't Worth It

So full disclosure, I haven't held or seen in person an iPhone X yet. But between the glitzy Apple ads, giant billboards, and hands on videos others have published, I know everything I need to know. The iPhone X isn't worth the money, at least not right now.
You may be wondering why I'm so quick to pass judgment on a product I've never used, let alone seen in person. Apple has admitted that the iPhone X was slated for 2018, but they worked really hard and got it out early. I don't buy that for a minute. The iPhone X is a reaction to Samsung, to Google, to LG, and HTC. Worse, it's a first generation reaction, with an unproven design, already admitted supply constraints, and compromises that don't make sense for users.

If you are an iPhone fan, I say buy the iPhone 8 or 8 Plus. These are proven designs of a great phone. No, there's no flashy design, but what are you losing from an iPhone X? A screen with a notch in it, Face ID, and Animoji. That's it.…

Life, Death and Tech

On April 6th 2013, I lost my sister, Anne Smedinghoff, to a suicide bomber in Afghanistan, where she was stationed working as Foreign Service Press Officer for the State Department. She was on a mission to deliver books to a school. Books being so important to help increase the literacy rate in Afghanistan so young people are able to read the Quran and other books for themselves to make informed decisions. The days and months that have followed have been the hardest days on my short life so far, and the struggle to move forward is not over for me. Through it all, I have come to several realizations about the industry I love to cover I want to share with people, especially through the lens of losing a loved one.

The thing that struck me first, is that my sister carried her iPhone 4S in her 'go-to bag' that she was holding at
the time of the attack. The iPhone is one of the most dropped, damaged, broken devices I see in people's hands, screens are cracked and backs are shatt…