Skip to main content

Why the new iPad is Revolutionary and not Evolutionary

The newest version of Apple's iPad has been unveiled to the world at large. Truth be told, the updates made to the device are pretty much along the lines of what people expected. Retina display, 4G radios, better camera (although not where I predicted) iOS 5.1 and the iPad 2 continuing to sell at a reduced $399.

So why is an expected update so revolutionary? What makes this iPad any better or more special than the previous two? The screen resolution. The fact that people can now hold a screen in their hand that will look better than the one hanging on their wall at home. The fact that Apple appears to be making the push for sharp, clear content on all of their devices. Apple is showing the world that the way you engage with and interact with content, apps and anything else has always been and always will be through the display. When content looks it's best and images, text, buttons, and all manner of graphics look as crisp and sharp as possible, the fact that you're looking at a screen begins to fade away and you engage yourself in the content in a way that you never would before. Its the same reason that going to the movies is more engaging that seeing a film at home. Granted the moron on their cell phone two rows over may detract from the experience, but if you've ever seen a movie in a nearly empty theater, the movie is the only thing you see, it brings you in because you're watching the highest resolution output on a large screen. In a similar way a large screen at home watching high definition content can draw you in as well.

Personally, I think what Apple has done here is set the bar very high for anyone else building a tablet device. Why would any consumer settle for anything less than the highest resolution display possible in a tablet device? I know that after seeing the iPad's new display I won't want anything less on any tablet I buy. To me this revolutionary in the expectations it will bring from consumers. If the iPad can do it, why can't your device and if your device can't do it, why should I buy it over an iPad? Hell, the TV I have sitting in my living room now has a lower resolution than an iPad, this will force everyone to step up their game.

Let me be clear, I personally will probably not buy the new iPad. I'm personally looking to see what Microsoft does with Windows 8, but I can tell you I'm going to be disappointed when no hardware manufacturer puts out a Windows 8 slate with a resolution higher than 1280x800 which is what my Chromebook I'm typing this blog post from has.

The new iPad is revolutionary for all the reasons people aren't expecting because the update is pretty much what people expected. In six months, when the majority of apps have been updated to take advantage of the new display, I bet you that the iPad will do more for HD content and above than Blu-ray has. I'm looking forward to this future of crystal clear and crisp graphics. Why would I settle for anything less?

Popular posts from this blog

Windows 10 S and Microsoft's Future

A few weeks ago, Microsoft held a press event to announce their new Education initiatives. While many focused on the high end hardware that was announced in the Surface Laptop, I am much more interested in the new version of Windows 10 that was announced: Windows 10 S.

Some have called Windows 10 S, "the future of Windows." I tend to agree. But I never think it will be the only version of Windows. Right now, at best, Windows 10 S will be the version of Windows your grandma, your parents, or your kids can use. But the "power users," the core of those who make up the creatives that Microsoft seems to be trying to cater to lately, will find the OS limitations a non-starter.

For those who still aren't aware, Windows 10 S, at it's core is a version of Windows that can only run applications delivered through the Windows 10 Store. The idea behind this is sound. It's the basic principal behind the iPad, iPhone, and Chrome OS (to a lesser extent). With a locked do…

iPhone X isn't Worth It

So full disclosure, I haven't held or seen in person an iPhone X yet. But between the glitzy Apple ads, giant billboards, and hands on videos others have published, I know everything I need to know. The iPhone X isn't worth the money, at least not right now.
You may be wondering why I'm so quick to pass judgment on a product I've never used, let alone seen in person. Apple has admitted that the iPhone X was slated for 2018, but they worked really hard and got it out early. I don't buy that for a minute. The iPhone X is a reaction to Samsung, to Google, to LG, and HTC. Worse, it's a first generation reaction, with an unproven design, already admitted supply constraints, and compromises that don't make sense for users.

If you are an iPhone fan, I say buy the iPhone 8 or 8 Plus. These are proven designs of a great phone. No, there's no flashy design, but what are you losing from an iPhone X? A screen with a notch in it, Face ID, and Animoji. That's it.…

Life, Death and Tech

On April 6th 2013, I lost my sister, Anne Smedinghoff, to a suicide bomber in Afghanistan, where she was stationed working as Foreign Service Press Officer for the State Department. She was on a mission to deliver books to a school. Books being so important to help increase the literacy rate in Afghanistan so young people are able to read the Quran and other books for themselves to make informed decisions. The days and months that have followed have been the hardest days on my short life so far, and the struggle to move forward is not over for me. Through it all, I have come to several realizations about the industry I love to cover I want to share with people, especially through the lens of losing a loved one.

The thing that struck me first, is that my sister carried her iPhone 4S in her 'go-to bag' that she was holding at
the time of the attack. The iPhone is one of the most dropped, damaged, broken devices I see in people's hands, screens are cracked and backs are shatt…