Skip to main content

Google Plays Around

Google has re-branded the Android Market to the Google Play Store. While I understand this to be a part of a larger strategy to bring all of Google's offerings under one banner, I must say I'm not impressed with how this has been handled by Google. Google seems to be searching for a way to compete with the ecosystems that Apple, Amazon and Microsoft are building and by changing the branding for their digital marketplaces overnight, I will argue has caused even more confusion.

From the get go, the Google Play announcement was a strange one. Announced with nothing more than a blog post and then pushed to users with no warning or plan, it caused nothing but confusion for those who have Android devices and don't keep up with Google's latest plans. Thankfully Verizon had the foresight to send a text to Android device owners to warn them of the impending change, but that was one carrier in one country. Most consumers don't visit Google's web version of the Android Market so they wouldn't see the announcement of the change there. Instead, consumers we met with being asked to accept new terms of service when they launched the Market the next time which would then replace the Market with the Play Store on their devices. On my Epic Touch 4G this transition was not smooth. After accepting the terms, I exited the store only to want to re-enter it by tapping the Market shortcut I had placed on my home screen. I was greeted with a "This application is no longer installed on your device" error message.

I know I was not the only one to face this problem. Other's who removed the shortcut from their home screens,  upon entering their app drawer to re-add the Market shortcut, found they couldn't find the Market app anymore and wrongly assumed that they had somehow deleted the Market from their devices. My own fiancee faced this very situation, and only after explaining the change and what icon she needed, was she able to get back to the Play Store. This has not been an isolated incident either.

I understand Google's approach. They feel they need to re-brand and bring all of their digital offerings under one banner to better market their storefronts to consumers, who for the most part seem to be shying away from purchasing premium content in Google's markets. The problems is Google doesn't have a robust tablet and desktop experience like Apple and Microsoft. If you want to enjoy the music purchased through Google, you must use a web browser, same with books, movies, and apps, all in the web browser. Apple has iTunes on Mac or PC, iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV, Microsoft has the Zune client, Xbox 360, Windows Phone and soon Windows 8. Google has Chrome and Chrome OS to back up Android handsets. Yes there is Google TV and Android Tablets, but neither has seen commercial success comparable to Android on phones.

There in lies the problem. Everyone understands why having Google services on their phone is a viable option, what they don't understand is why their PC or TV or tablet should. Especially when Apple and Microsoft make much better competing products. Consumers still like having a physical copy of their media on their physical devices that stay at home. That's why iTunes is still the dominant place to get music, that's why people buy movies on DVDs or Blu-Ray still, to own a copy. Even iTunes let you purchase and keep movies, Google only lets you rent and stream. We may be moving to a cloud storage world, where physical files never make it down to our desktop, but we aren't there yet. Always on, always available internet isn't there yet and because of that Google is missing out on the whole ecosystem. Consumers still want to be able to see their files on their computer, to know they have control of them and that in case Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Google or whoever they are hosting with screws up, their content is still safe.

Google is clearly a forward looking company, but the world hasn't caught up with their vision yet. With the way things are going, I don't think the world will be ready for a cloud only option within the next 10 years. Data speeds are still too slow, 4G LTE still has a small worldwide footprint and data plans are still too restrictive to be pushing around the content that Google wants to from their cloud to your device. For the foreseeable future, local storage still wins and Google needs to realize that if they want to keep their mobile advantage they've built with Android.

Popular posts from this blog

Windows 10 S and Microsoft's Future

A few weeks ago, Microsoft held a press event to announce their new Education initiatives. While many focused on the high end hardware that was announced in the Surface Laptop, I am much more interested in the new version of Windows 10 that was announced: Windows 10 S.

Some have called Windows 10 S, "the future of Windows." I tend to agree. But I never think it will be the only version of Windows. Right now, at best, Windows 10 S will be the version of Windows your grandma, your parents, or your kids can use. But the "power users," the core of those who make up the creatives that Microsoft seems to be trying to cater to lately, will find the OS limitations a non-starter.

For those who still aren't aware, Windows 10 S, at it's core is a version of Windows that can only run applications delivered through the Windows 10 Store. The idea behind this is sound. It's the basic principal behind the iPad, iPhone, and Chrome OS (to a lesser extent). With a locked do…

iPhone X isn't Worth It

So full disclosure, I haven't held or seen in person an iPhone X yet. But between the glitzy Apple ads, giant billboards, and hands on videos others have published, I know everything I need to know. The iPhone X isn't worth the money, at least not right now.
You may be wondering why I'm so quick to pass judgment on a product I've never used, let alone seen in person. Apple has admitted that the iPhone X was slated for 2018, but they worked really hard and got it out early. I don't buy that for a minute. The iPhone X is a reaction to Samsung, to Google, to LG, and HTC. Worse, it's a first generation reaction, with an unproven design, already admitted supply constraints, and compromises that don't make sense for users.

If you are an iPhone fan, I say buy the iPhone 8 or 8 Plus. These are proven designs of a great phone. No, there's no flashy design, but what are you losing from an iPhone X? A screen with a notch in it, Face ID, and Animoji. That's it.…

Life, Death and Tech

On April 6th 2013, I lost my sister, Anne Smedinghoff, to a suicide bomber in Afghanistan, where she was stationed working as Foreign Service Press Officer for the State Department. She was on a mission to deliver books to a school. Books being so important to help increase the literacy rate in Afghanistan so young people are able to read the Quran and other books for themselves to make informed decisions. The days and months that have followed have been the hardest days on my short life so far, and the struggle to move forward is not over for me. Through it all, I have come to several realizations about the industry I love to cover I want to share with people, especially through the lens of losing a loved one.

The thing that struck me first, is that my sister carried her iPhone 4S in her 'go-to bag' that she was holding at
the time of the attack. The iPhone is one of the most dropped, damaged, broken devices I see in people's hands, screens are cracked and backs are shatt…